Home/Integrations/Clearinghouses/Optum
For practices whose claims move through Change Healthcare or OptumYour Clearinghouse Changed Owners. Did Anything Else Change?
Practices still say Change Healthcare, and the invoice may say Optum. The two names refer to the same service for most purposes: Change Healthcare was acquired by Optum, part of UnitedHealth Group, in a transaction completed in 2022. If your claims have moved the same way ever since and your staff never had to learn anything new, that is the acquisition working as intended, and there is no reason on this page to go looking for a different network.
Start with the free CareVixis practice assessment. No email required.
The Name Changed. The Claims Kept Moving.
Change Healthcare became part of Optum, your staff carried on as before, and if nothing about your week changed then the acquisition worked as intended.
Scale Buys You Real Things.
Direct payer connections, continuous investment, and a network that stays up. You get those whether or not anybody ever thinks about them.
Scale Does Not Buy You Attention.
The published revenue cycle products are largely addressed to health systems and hospitals. That is a reasonable place to sell large software, and it puts a practice your size some distance from the customer they were designed around.
Nobody at that scale is reading your remittances on a Tuesday.
So Somebody Independent Reads the Remittances.
CareVixis reads what your payers returned from outside the organisation that moved the claim, on a schedule, grouping denials by cause rather than working them one at a time.
That is independent revenue cycle review, and it is not something a network sells.
Keep the Network.
One of the largest clearinghouse networks in the country is carrying your claims and there is no operational reason to disturb that. Keeping it is a supported outcome, not a fallback.
Keep the network. Add somebody independent reading what came back.
Everything below is the evidence for what you just read.
What Optum publishes about its own revenue cycle products and who each is built for, two questions worth asking after an acquisition, a ten-question framework, and the source for every fact on this page.
Scale Is a Genuine Advantage. It Is Not the Same as Attention.
A very large clearinghouse can do things a small one cannot. It can hold direct connections to payers that a smaller network reaches indirectly, invest continuously in the plumbing, and keep the lights on at a scale most vendors never reach. Those are real benefits and a practice receives them whether or not anybody ever thinks about it.
What scale does not produce is a person who knows your practice. Optum publishes a substantial revenue cycle catalogue, and reading the way those products are described is instructive: the published solutions are aimed largely at health systems and hospitals, with several of them listing health systems as the buyer they are built for. That is a reasonable commercial decision about where large software is sold, and it says nothing about the quality of the transport your practice relies on.
It does mean that an independent practice sits some distance from the customer these products were designed around. The claims still move. The question this page asks is who, on a Tuesday, reads what came back for your practice specifically.
What Optum Publishes About Its Own Revenue Cycle Products
The descriptions below are Optum's own, read from its business site and cited at the foot of this page. They are reproduced to show what is published and who it is published for, not to evaluate any of it.
| What it does | How Optum describes it |
|---|---|
| Ambulatory Revenue Cycle Technology | Published as end-to-end automated revenue performance solutions for cash flow, workflow and patient experience. Listed as best for health systems and hospitals. |
| Medical Claims and Reimbursement Management | Published as improving claims accuracy and preventing claim errors to minimize denials. Listed as best for health systems and hospitals, and for providers. |
| Optum Integrity One | Published as an end-to-end solution for the middle revenue cycle, covering efficiency, accuracy and revenue integrity. Listed as best for health systems, hospitals, payers and providers. |
| Optum Real | Published as improving transparency and administrative efficiency through payer and provider connection. Listed as best for health systems, hospitals and payers. |
| Patient Access | Published as services to improve engagement, loyalty and revenue and to drive patient acquisition. Listed as best for health systems and hospitals. |
| Patient Payments | Published as patient financial engagement and e-cashiering solutions. Listed as best for health systems and hospitals. |
| Healthcare consulting services | Published as advisory services for executives, health systems and hospitals, payers and providers. |
Read as a list, two things stand out. The catalogue is broad and it is largely addressed to organizations with a revenue cycle department. Neither observation is a criticism of the clearinghouse a practice actually uses, and neither is a reason to move.
Two Questions Worth Asking After an Acquisition, and Neither Is About the Transport
The first is who holds the relationship. Practices that signed with Change Healthcare signed with a company that no longer exists under that name. Support paths, contacts and portals may all still work, and often do. What usually goes missing is the person who once knew your practice by name, and nothing about the transaction was designed to replace them.
The second is independence, and it is structural rather than suspicious. Optum sells revenue cycle services as well as moving claims, and it belongs to a group whose business includes health plans. None of that implies anything improper, and a practice should not choose a clearinghouse on that basis. But it does mean the party moving your claim and the party that would sell you help with your claim can be the same organization, and an outside reader is worth having for the ordinary reason that outside readers ask different questions.
Neither question is answered by switching networks. Both are answered by somebody independent reading the remittance data on a schedule and recording why each failure happened.
What the portal will show you
- Which claims were submitted and accepted.
- Which claims were rejected, and the code that came with them.
- What each payer remitted, line by line.
- That the transport is working.
What a portal cannot be expected to show you
- Whether this month's denials resemble last month's.
- Whether one payer is behaving differently than it did in the spring.
- Whether the rejections share a single fixable cause.
- Whether the appeal that was filed was ever paid.
- Whether anything stopped arriving altogether.
Six Places Revenue Goes Quiet on a Large Network
None of these is a defect in the network, and none of them is fixed by moving to another one. Each is about who is reading the result for your practice.
The claim type that stopped arriving
A submission path changes and one category of claim quietly stops going out. Nothing errors. The total is smaller, and the reason is three steps upstream of anyone looking.
A code that means different things to different payers
The same rejection reason arrives from two payers for two unrelated causes. Worked as one category, one of them is fixed and the other keeps happening.
The appeal with no recorded outcome
It was filed, the note says filed, and nobody closed the loop. Whether it was paid is genuinely unknown until somebody reconciles it against the remittance.
Underpayment inside an accepted claim
Paid below the contracted rate is not an error state anywhere in the pipeline. It will not appear on any list of problems because, technically, nothing went wrong.
A support answer nobody wrote down
The question was resolved on a call eight months ago. The person who took the call has moved on and the practice is about to ask it again.
The baseline that was never set
Without a comparison against previous months, a gradual change in payer behaviour looks like an ordinary bad week, every week.
None of these needs a different clearinghouse. They need somebody whose only job is reading what came back, on a schedule, for a practice your size. That is what CareVixis adds beside the network you already use.
Where This Fits Around What You Already Run
An illustration of the general path a claim takes for a practice on Change Healthcare or Optum, and where an independent reading is added. It is not a description of any integration between CareVixis and Optum, and none is claimed.
- Eligibility is checkedIn whatever system your practice uses before the visit.
- The claim is created and scrubbedIn your practice management system, on your existing workflow.
- The claim moves through the networkUnder whichever name your practice knows it by.
- The payer adjudicatesAnd responds with payment, adjustment, denial or rejection.
- The remittance advice returnsInto the same systems and the same posting routine you use now.
- CareVixis reads it independentlyOutside the organization that moved the claim, on a schedule, counting causes rather than working items one at a time.
- The cause is recorded and the pattern is reportedWith VixisTrace™ for claim root cause and VixisIQ™ for the pattern across months, where appropriate data can be obtained and normalized.
What to Ask When Your Clearinghouse Also Sells Revenue Cycle Services
Ten questions. Ask them of Optum, of any billing company, and of CareVixis. A framework is only worth having if the same questions answer for all three.
-
Which company does your practice actually hold a contract with?
After an acquisition this is worth confirming rather than assuming, if only so the right name is on the renewal.
-
Who is your named contact, and when did you last speak?
If the honest answer is a support queue, that is useful to know before you need something quickly.
-
Who reads your remittance data, and how often?
Posting from it and reading it are different activities. Only one of them finds causes.
-
Is the cause of each failed claim written down anywhere?
A worked denial and a recorded cause are not the same thing, and only one of them prevents a repeat.
-
How would you notice if one claim type stopped going out?
This is the failure that produces no error message, and the one practices find latest.
-
How would you notice an underpayment?
Underpaid claims pass every check in the pipeline. If the answer is that somebody would spot it, ask when they last did.
-
Does anyone compare this month against previous months?
A single month cannot show a payer changing its behaviour. Only a baseline can.
-
If you buy revenue services from the same organization, who checks that work?
This is a question about structure, not about honesty, and it is fair to ask of CareVixis too.
-
What is the oldest unresolved claim right now?
If nobody can answer quickly, the aging list is not being worked as a list.
-
Who is accountable for the number at the end of the month?
Not for the software working. For the revenue. The two are routinely confused.
Using Optum? Keep It.
If your claims move through Change Healthcare or Optum, they are moving across one of the largest networks in the country, your staff know the workflow, and there is no operational reason to disturb any of it. CareVixis does not ask you to.
Keeping the network you have is a supported outcome, not a fallback. CareVixis will work beside it, read what your payers return, record why claims failed, and stay accountable for the answer, whether or not anything you use today ever changes.
Keep the network. Add somebody independent reading what came back.
Questions Practices Ask About Change Healthcare, Optum and Getting Paid
Is Change Healthcare the same as Optum?
For most practical purposes a practice will encounter both names for the same service. Change Healthcare was acquired by Optum, part of UnitedHealth Group, in a transaction completed in 2022, and provider-facing material has moved to Optum branding since.
Does CareVixis replace the clearinghouse?
No. The network transmits your claims and returns what payers say, and CareVixis does not ask a practice to leave it. If a question is already answered by something you have, it does not need asking twice.
Optum already sells revenue cycle management. Why would we use CareVixis?
Optum's published revenue cycle products are largely addressed to health systems and hospitals, and a practice is welcome to evaluate them. The framework on this page is written so the same questions can be asked of Optum, of CareVixis and of anyone else, which is the only fair way to compare.
Does CareVixis connect to Optum?
No. CareVixis claims no API integration, native integration, certification or partnership with Optum, Change Healthcare or UnitedHealth Group. CareVixis works from data your practice is able to make available, and what can be analyzed depends on what that data contains.
Will anything about our day change?
The intention is that the front-desk and clinical workflow your staff already know stays as it is. The work CareVixis does happens after the payer responds.
What would CareVixis look at first?
The remittance data grouped by cause rather than by claim, and the oldest unresolved items. Those two views answer most of the questions on this page, where appropriate data can be obtained and normalized.
Keep Optum. Add Revenue Intelligence.
Keep the network your claims already move across, and keep the workflow your staff already know. Add the thing a network of that size cannot offer a practice of your size, which is somebody independent reading what your payers actually did.
Free. No obligation. No email required.
Sources
- Optum, revenue cycle management solutions page, optum.com. Source of the published solution names and descriptions quoted in the table above, including Ambulatory Revenue Cycle Technology, Medical Claims and Reimbursement Management, Optum Integrity One, Optum Real, Patient Access, Patient Payments and healthcare consulting services, and of the audiences each is listed as best for. CareVixis has not independently tested any of these products and states them as the vendor's own descriptions. Accessed 19 September 2026.
- Optum, providers overview page, optum.com. Source of the statement that Optum publishes provider-facing revenue cycle, claims and payment solutions under the Optum name. Accessed 19 September 2026.
- UnitedHealth Group and Optum corporate announcements of the completion of the Change Healthcare transaction in 2022, as reported on the companies' own sites. Source of the statement that Change Healthcare became part of Optum and that practices may encounter either name. Accessed 19 September 2026.
CareVixis does not restate another company's marketing figures. Optum publishes averages for revenue identified, cost avoidance and net patient revenue managed on the page cited above; none of them appears here, because an average across a vendor's client base, most of which are organizations far larger than a private practice, predicts nothing for your practice. Where a figure matters to a decision, it should be your own.
Trademarks and non-affiliation
Optum, Change Healthcare, Optum Real and Optum Integrity One are trademarks of their respective owners. VixisIQ™ and VixisTrace™ are trademarks of CareVixis Healthcare Revenue Solutions.
CareVixis is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by or certified by Optum, Change Healthcare or UnitedHealth Group. No API integration, native integration, certification or partnership with Optum is claimed.
The Clearinghouse Moves the Claim. CareVixis Manages What Happens Next.
CareVixis can work with the clearinghouse a practice already uses. VixisIQ™ helps surface payer, remittance, denial and A/R patterns, while VixisTrace™ supports investigation and root-cause resolution when a claim needs attention. Changing clearinghouses is not the point. Visibility and accountability are.